Drop the XvMC protocol handling code, so clients cannot access it anymore,
but still leaving enough of the DDX/driver intact in order not to break
the module ABI.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Only used inside shm.c, not anywhere else, so no need to keep it
in a public header file.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Since it's now doing nothing more than unhooking itself, we really
don't need it anymore.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Reported incorrectly in https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1817 as:
xwayland-24.1.6/redhat-linux-build/../Xext/sync.c:2835:33: acquire_memory: allocated here
xwayland-24.1.6/redhat-linux-build/../Xext/sync.c:2843:12: danger: ‘priv’ leaks here; was allocated at [(30)](sarif:/runs/0/results/5/codeFlows/0/threadFlows/0/locations/29)
but the "leak" is really saving the pointer in an uninitalized pointer in
a structure that was already freed when the malloc of the SysCounterInfo
struct failed in SyncCreateSystemCounter(), because it returned the address
of the freed struct instead of NULL to indicate failure.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/2072>
Instead of having a pointer to a struct just consisting of a pointer,
just move that struct directly into the privates area, so we not just
save one extra indirection, but also not having to care about an extra
chunk of malloc'ed memory anymore (thus getting rid of a potential
OOM bug)
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
ShmScreenClose() needs to be registered as ScreenClose hook into
all screens - otherwise it won't be called and so we're missing
cleanup work.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Not used by any drivers, so no need to keep it in public SDK.
Since it's not used by any drivers, effectively no ABI change, so
can be safely done within ABI-25.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
iterating over screen list via lambda-esque macros calls like this
DIX_FOR_EACH_SCREEN({
do_something
});
withing the body, the iterator variables `walkScreenIdx` and `walkScreen`
are defined and can be directly used (read-only). the code inside the body
is running in a separate scope.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Move the callbacks directly into DIX, since it's actually core infrastructure.
Also simplifying the whole machinery, by just using a simpel CallbackListPtr.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Not used by any external drivers, so no need to keep them in public
SDK headers. Since they're never used by drivers, it's effectively
not an ABI change, so can safely be done within ABI-25.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Removing the namespace assignment of killed clients in ClientState-hook
is too early - we still need it later. Using the new ClientDestroyCallback
instead.
Closes: https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver/issues/486
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Move the callbacks directly into DIX, since it's actually core infrastructure.
Also simplifying the whole machinery, by just using a simpel CallbackListPtr.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This type is already defined in `include/callback.h` - anybody who wants it
most likely needs that include file, too.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Move functions/macros dealing with request parsing or reply assembly/write
out of the big dix_priv.h into their own headers. This new header will also
get more of those function/macros soon (yet still in the pipeline).
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This struct isn't used anymore for almost a decade, just a left over from
audit hooks removal, back in 2016.
Fixes: 6cb34816af
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Move the callbacks directly into DIX, since it's actually core infrastructure.
Also simplifying the whole machinery, by just using a simpel CallbackListPtr.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This hook was never used, so no need to keep around something that's
really not used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
> In file included from ../Xext/xvdisp.c:33:
> ../Xext/xvdisp.c: In function ‘ProcXvQueryImageAttributes’:
> ../Xext/xvdisp.c:768:19: warning: typedef ‘int_size_wrong_’ locally defined but not used [-Wunused-local-typedefs]
> 768 | __size_assert(int, sizeof(INT32));
> | ^~~
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Follow-up on renaming dixGetFirstScreenPtr() to dixGetMasterScreen():
also rename the target variables for correct technical terminology.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
In Xinerama/Panoramix configuration there's one screen that's having special
meaning - it's used for simulating as the frontend for all client operations:
the clients (should) only talk to that screen, while panoramix subsystem is
proxying those operations to all the other screens (with certain changed
applied, eg. coordinate transformations).
Historically, this screen happens to be the first one in the system (some of
it's proc's are hooked up in order to achieve desired behaviour). That's why it
used to be accessed via screenInfo.screens[0] - that already had been encapsulated
into a tiny helper `dixGetFirstScreen()`.
a) the correct terminus technicus for a situation where one device (or SW entity)
entirely controlling others is a master-slave-relationship: the controlling
device/entity is `master`, the controlled ones are `slave` (to that specific
master).
b) the term "first screen" is inacurate and misleading here: what the caller's are
actually interest in isn't the first entry in the screen array, but the screen
that's controlling the others. With upcoming refactoring of the Xinerama/Panoramix
subsystem, this might well be a different array index than 0.
c) the term `default` also wouldn't match: `default` implies there's a real practical
choice, and such value applies when no explicit choice has been made. But in this
case, it practically doesn't make sense (except perhaps for debugging purpose)
for a client to use any different screen.
Therefore fixing the function name to the correct technical terminology.
(for sake of patch readability, renaming corresponding variables is left to
subsequent patches).
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>