Only internally within OS layer and screen saver logic,
so no need to keep it exported.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Instead of internally faking requests, factor out the actual logic
into separate function, which is getting everything it needs as
parameters, so no need to fiddle with request buffer anymore.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Instead of directly accessing the global screenInfo.screens[] array,
let everybody go through a little inline helper. This one also checks
for array bounds - if the screen doesn't exist, return NULL.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
In order to reduce complexity of wrapped core request handlers with PanoramiX,
split the ProcCreateWindow() function into two pieces: the upper half is the
usual (non-PanoramiX) handler, while the lower one is what's called by both
the usual handler, as well as the PanoramiX' one.
We're already passing in the request parameters as separate pointers, so
follow-up commits can easily change PanoramiX handler to not tweaking the
request buffer directly anymore. Another one is letting PanoramiXCreateWindow()
be called by ProcCreateWindow explicitly (when enabled), so we don't need to
wrap the core request proc vector anymore. Once that's done, the swapping can
also be moved into ProcCreateWindow().
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
The private struct is pretty small and it needs to be allocated anyways,
so save an extra allocation by directly embedding it.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Only used inside shm.c, not anywhere else, so no need to keep it
in a public header file.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Since it's now doing nothing more than unhooking itself, we really
don't need it anymore.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Reported incorrectly in https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/issues/1817 as:
xwayland-24.1.6/redhat-linux-build/../Xext/sync.c:2835:33: acquire_memory: allocated here
xwayland-24.1.6/redhat-linux-build/../Xext/sync.c:2843:12: danger: ‘priv’ leaks here; was allocated at [(30)](sarif:/runs/0/results/5/codeFlows/0/threadFlows/0/locations/29)
but the "leak" is really saving the pointer in an uninitalized pointer in
a structure that was already freed when the malloc of the SysCounterInfo
struct failed in SyncCreateSystemCounter(), because it returned the address
of the freed struct instead of NULL to indicate failure.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/2072>
Instead of having a pointer to a struct just consisting of a pointer,
just move that struct directly into the privates area, so we not just
save one extra indirection, but also not having to care about an extra
chunk of malloc'ed memory anymore (thus getting rid of a potential
OOM bug)
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
ShmScreenClose() needs to be registered as ScreenClose hook into
all screens - otherwise it won't be called and so we're missing
cleanup work.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Not used by any drivers, so no need to keep it in public SDK.
Since it's not used by any drivers, effectively no ABI change, so
can be safely done within ABI-25.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
iterating over screen list via lambda-esque macros calls like this
DIX_FOR_EACH_SCREEN({
do_something
});
withing the body, the iterator variables `walkScreenIdx` and `walkScreen`
are defined and can be directly used (read-only). the code inside the body
is running in a separate scope.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Move the callbacks directly into DIX, since it's actually core infrastructure.
Also simplifying the whole machinery, by just using a simpel CallbackListPtr.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Not used by any external drivers, so no need to keep them in public
SDK headers. Since they're never used by drivers, it's effectively
not an ABI change, so can safely be done within ABI-25.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Removing the namespace assignment of killed clients in ClientState-hook
is too early - we still need it later. Using the new ClientDestroyCallback
instead.
Closes: https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver/issues/486
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Move the callbacks directly into DIX, since it's actually core infrastructure.
Also simplifying the whole machinery, by just using a simpel CallbackListPtr.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This type is already defined in `include/callback.h` - anybody who wants it
most likely needs that include file, too.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Move functions/macros dealing with request parsing or reply assembly/write
out of the big dix_priv.h into their own headers. This new header will also
get more of those function/macros soon (yet still in the pipeline).
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This struct isn't used anymore for almost a decade, just a left over from
audit hooks removal, back in 2016.
Fixes: 6cb34816af
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Move the callbacks directly into DIX, since it's actually core infrastructure.
Also simplifying the whole machinery, by just using a simpel CallbackListPtr.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
This hook was never used, so no need to keep around something that's
really not used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
No need to have a hole bunch of extra functions, if we can just easily
inline the few relevant lines.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
