Instead of directly accessing the global screenInfo.screens[] array,
let everybody go through a little inline helper. This one also checks
for array bounds - if the screen doesn't exist, return NULL.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
iterating over screen list via lambda-esque macros calls like this
DIX_FOR_EACH_SCREEN({
do_something
});
withing the body, the iterator variables `walkScreenIdx` and `walkScreen`
are defined and can be directly used (read-only). the code inside the body
is running in a separate scope.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Nobody's using this pointer anymore, everybody's using the global
screenInfo structure.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
In Xinerama/Panoramix configuration there's one screen that's having special
meaning - it's used for simulating as the frontend for all client operations:
the clients (should) only talk to that screen, while panoramix subsystem is
proxying those operations to all the other screens (with certain changed
applied, eg. coordinate transformations).
Historically, this screen happens to be the first one in the system (some of
it's proc's are hooked up in order to achieve desired behaviour). That's why it
used to be accessed via screenInfo.screens[0] - that already had been encapsulated
into a tiny helper `dixGetFirstScreen()`.
a) the correct terminus technicus for a situation where one device (or SW entity)
entirely controlling others is a master-slave-relationship: the controlling
device/entity is `master`, the controlled ones are `slave` (to that specific
master).
b) the term "first screen" is inacurate and misleading here: what the caller's are
actually interest in isn't the first entry in the screen array, but the screen
that's controlling the others. With upcoming refactoring of the Xinerama/Panoramix
subsystem, this might well be a different array index than 0.
c) the term `default` also wouldn't match: `default` implies there's a real practical
choice, and such value applies when no explicit choice has been made. But in this
case, it practically doesn't make sense (except perhaps for debugging purpose)
for a client to use any different screen.
Therefore fixing the function name to the correct technical terminology.
(for sake of patch readability, renaming corresponding variables is left to
subsequent patches).
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Instead of everybody directly accessing the (internal) screenInfo struct,
let those consumers only interested in first screen use a little helper.
Also caching the value if it's needed several times.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
fix warning:
> In file included from ../hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c:53:
> In file included from ../include/input.h:51:
> ../include/screenint.h:55:25: warning: redefinition of typedef 'ScreenPtr' is a C11 feature [-Wtypedef-redefinition]
> typedef struct _Screen *ScreenPtr;
> ^
> ../dix/screenint_priv.h:11:25: note: previous definition is here
> typedef struct _Screen *ScreenPtr;
> ^
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1427>
These aren't used by any drivers/modules, just DDX'es, so no need to export.
Note: tigervnc does use it, but it has it's own DDX, therefore directly
linked in, just like the in-tree DDX'es which doesn't need exporting.
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1349>
